[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMTg6k09AWTDZKQCJTBTUGwQ0OoHhdCLFdcbbCv5kzTjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:30:14 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] PM / Runtime: introduce pm_runtime_set[get]_memalloc_noio()
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
> how is this to work with power management domains?
Could you explain it in a bit detail? Why is PM domain involved?
Suppose PM domain is involved, its domain runtime_resume callback
is still run in the context with PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag set if the
affected 'device' is passed to the callback.
> And I may be dense, but disks are added in slave_configure().
> This seems to be a race to me.
Sorry, could you describe what is the race?
Suppose drivers set correct parent device to the disk device(gendisk),
then add the disk into device model via register_disk(), the solution
should be fine.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists