lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351615090-24398-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:38:09 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] srcu: Add DEFINE_SRCU()

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

In old days, we had two different API sets for dynamic-allocated per-CPU
data and DEFINE_PER_CPU()-defined per_cpu data, and because SRCU used
dynamic-allocated per-CPU data, its srcu_struct structures cannot be
declared statically.  This commit therefore introduces DEFINE_SRCU()
and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() to allow statically declared SRCU structures,
using the new static per-CPU interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Updated for __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER() added argument,
	   fixed whitespace issue. ]
---
 include/linux/srcu.h |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 5cce128..6eb691b 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ struct rcu_batch {
 	struct rcu_head *head, **tail;
 };
 
+#define RCU_BATCH_INIT(name) { NULL, &(name.head) }
+
 struct srcu_struct {
 	unsigned completed;
 	struct srcu_struct_array __percpu *per_cpu_ref;
@@ -72,14 +74,42 @@ int __init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp, const char *name,
 	__init_srcu_struct((sp), #sp, &__srcu_key); \
 })
 
+#define __SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(srcu_name)	.dep_map = { .name = #srcu_name },
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
 int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
 
+#define __SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(srcu_name)
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
 void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
 
+#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name)					\
+	{								\
+		.completed = -300,					\
+		.per_cpu_ref = &name##_srcu_array,			\
+		.queue_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.queue_lock),	\
+		.running = false,					\
+		.batch_queue = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_queue),	\
+		.batch_check0 = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_check0),	\
+		.batch_check1 = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_check1),	\
+		.batch_done = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_done),		\
+		.work = __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER(name.work, process_srcu, 0),\
+		__SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(name)				\
+	}
+
+/*
+ * define and init a srcu struct at build time.
+ * dont't call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
+ */
+#define DEFINE_SRCU(name)						\
+	static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
+	struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+
+#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name)					\
+	static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
+	static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+
 /**
  * call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
  * @sp: srcu_struct in queue the callback
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ