lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351616713-26930-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:05:04 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Optimize the 'rcu_pending' for RCU trace

From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch implements the new 'rcu_pending' interface under each rsp
directory, by using the 'CPU units sequence reading', thus avoiding loss
of tracing data.

Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree_trace.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index e387a64..8b24867 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ static const struct file_operations rcugp_fops = {
 
 static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
+	if (!rdp->beenonline)
+		return;
 	seq_printf(m, "%3d%cnp=%ld ",
 		   rdp->cpu,
 		   cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) ? '!' : ' ',
@@ -485,16 +487,12 @@ static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	int cpu;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	struct rcu_state *rsp;
 
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
 		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
-		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
-			if (rdp->beenonline)
-				print_one_rcu_pending(m, rdp);
-		}
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+			print_one_rcu_pending(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -512,6 +510,32 @@ static const struct file_operations rcu_pending_fops = {
 	.release = single_release,
 };
 
+static int new_show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+	print_one_rcu_pending(m, (struct rcu_data *)v);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations new_rcu_pending_op = {
+	.start = r_start,
+	.next  = r_next,
+	.stop  = r_stop,
+	.show  = new_show_rcu_pending,
+};
+
+static int new_rcu_pending_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return r_open(inode, file, &new_rcu_pending_op);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations new_rcu_pending_fops = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.open = new_rcu_pending_open,
+	.read = seq_read,
+	.llseek = no_llseek,
+	.release = seq_release,
+};
+
 static int show_rcutorture(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	seq_printf(m, "rcutorture test sequence: %lu %s\n",
@@ -561,6 +585,11 @@ static int __init rcutree_trace_init(void)
 					rspdir, rsp, &new_rcudata_csv_fops);
 			if (!retval)
 				goto free_out;
+
+			retval = debugfs_create_file("rcu_pending", 0444,
+					rspdir, rsp, &new_rcu_pending_fops);
+			if (!retval)
+				goto free_out;
 	}
 
 	retval = debugfs_create_file("rcubarrier", 0444, rcudir,
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ