[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSRj4FAQpG_vGOmKzvsv+7oWmtAaesJ5+-RuUJmOer2zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:29:16 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [BUG] perf tools: does not process data mmaps correctly
Arnaldo,
A long time ago, I brought up the issue of perf failing to resolve
data symbols despite having the MAP__VARIABLE map type.
Now that I have posted the PEBS-LL patch series, there is a test
case to debug this.
I looked again at it today. Start from ip__resolve_data() in my patchset.
IT is looking for a data symbol given an address.
Seems to me the core of the problem is how perf processes the MMAP
records in machine__process_mmap_event():
int machine__process_mmap_event(struct machine *machine, union
perf_event *event)
{
...
thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, event->mmap.pid);
if (thread == NULL)
goto out_problem;
map = map__new(&machine->user_dsos, event->mmap.start,
event->mmap.len, event->mmap.pgoff,
event->mmap.pid, event->mmap.filename,
MAP__FUNCTION);
I don't see any effort to distinguish code from data here. All mmaps are
treated as code.
That could be fine, if then you drop MAP__VARIABLE.
So how is this supposed to work?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists