[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ip9r5gus.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:51:39 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
ming.m.lin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v1 07/10] perf tools: add mem access sampling core support
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:15:49 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch adds the sorting and histogram support
> functions to enable profiling of memory accesses.
>
> The following sorting orders are added:
> - symbol_daddr: data address symbol (or raw address)
> - dso_daddr: data address shared object
> - cost: access cost
> - locked: access uses locked transaction
> - tlb : TLB access
> - mem : memory level of the access (L1, L2, L3, RAM, ...)
> - snoop: access snoop mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +/* --sort daddr_sym */
> +static int64_t
> +sort__daddr_cmp(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
> +{
> + struct addr_map_symbol *l = &left->mem_info->daddr;
> + struct addr_map_symbol *r = &right->mem_info->daddr;
> +
> + return (int64_t)(r->addr - l->addr);
> +}
Doesn't it need to compare symbol (start address) if any, before doing
it with raw addresses?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists