[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5090C0DD.4070505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:40:37 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RFC 3/3] kvm: Check system load and handle different
commit cases accordingly
On 10/30/2012 01:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 11:27 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> Okay, now IIUC, usage of *any* global measure is bad?
>
> Yep, people like to carve up their machines, esp. now that they're
> somewhat bigger than they used to be. This can result in very asymmetric
> loads, no global measure can ever deal with that.
Thanks for explaining the concerns. Very True and if load is very
asymmetric due to power optimization etc constraints. This may affect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists