[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wqy73xzo.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:24:27 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/15] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist periods
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:01:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 15:59 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> > Yes, the callchain part needs to be improved. Peter's idea
>> > indeed looks good to me too.
>>
>> FWIW, I think this is exactly what sysprof does, except that
>> tool isn't usable for other reasons.. You might want to look
>> at it though.
>
> I always found the fundamental sysprof system-wide call graph
> profiling output/view superior - and so do many Xorg developers
> who are using SysProf that I talked to - so I'd strongly
> encourage to use that ordering and grouping for the default perf
> call-graph profiling output/view.
Okay, I'll look at the sysprof.
Anyway, do you have any other comments for the general --cumulate
approach in this series (esp. with --branch-stack)?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists