[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201210302222.15656.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:22:15 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
John Linn <linnj@...inx.com>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC
On Saturday 27 October 2012, Michal Simek wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > index 08c1231..72904a2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> > */
> > #define VMALLOC_OFFSET (8*1024*1024)
> > #define VMALLOC_START (((unsigned long)high_memory +
> > VMALLOC_OFFSET) & ~(VMALLOC_OFFSET-1))
> > -#define VMALLOC_END 0xff000000UL
> > +#define VMALLOC_END _AC(0xff000000,UL)
>
> This shouldn't be the part of this series but should go to mainline through different tree.
> Arnd, Olof: Can you take this patch to your arm-soc tree?
>
> I don't think it is a good workstyle to propose it to mainline through zynq soc tree.
> What do you think?
The arm-soc tree is not the right place either, this is architecture code which is
in Russell's domain. I would suggest getting an Ack from Russell if he's ok with
it and then merging it together with your other changes into arm-soc.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists