lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38620644.IyR5R8rjKP@percival>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:04:09 +0900
From:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: How about a gpio_get(device *, char *) function?

Hi,

Would anyone be opposed to having a gpio_get() function that works similarly 
to e.g. regulator_get() and clk_get()?

I can see some good reasons to have this:

- Less platform data to pass to drivers,
- Consistency between different subsystems. Regulator, clock, PWM, ... all use 
this scheme.
- The "device-specific indirection" could make some DT structures more 
reusable. Right now the only way to address a GPIO through the DT is via a 
phandle that includes the GPIO number - thus hard-coded.

The implementation would be rather simple, and the function would just return 
the right GPIO number (acquired through gpio_request).

Rationale for this: I would like to be able to share power sequences between 
devices, e.g. to completely extract the per-device resources from the 
sequence. Every power sequence step references either a regulator, PWM, or 
GPIO. For regulators and PWMs separation is easy because their subsystems 
provide regulator_get() and pwm_get() which allow the resource to be 
referenced by name in the sequence, and resolved to different instances 
depending on the device. GPIOs, on the other hand, can only be referenced by 
number - and that makes it necessary to duplicate the sequence's structure in 
memory for every device that may use it. It if was possible to reference GPIOs 
by names that resolve to different GPIO numbers according to the device, then 
the problem would be solved.

There are probably other use-cases that would benefit from this, if you know of 
one please feel free to share.

Thanks,
Alex.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ