lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351675303-11786-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:21:38 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PART5 Patch 0/5] introduce a new boot option 'kernelcore_max_addr'

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

This patch is part5 of the following patchset:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319

The patchset is based on Linus's tree with these three patches already applied:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/24/151
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/150

Part1 is here:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30

Part2 is here:
    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135166705909544&w=2

Part3 is here:
    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167050510527&w=2

Part4 is here:
    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167344211401&w=2

You can apply this patch without the other parts. But it only can work with
part1-5.

We need something like kernelcore_max_addr=XX boot option to limit the
kernelcore upper address.

The memory with higher address will be migratable(movable) and they
are easier to be offline(always ready to be offline when the system don't require
so much memory).

It makes things easy when we dynamic hot-add/remove memory, make better
utilities of memories, and helps for THP.

Lai Jiangshan (1):
  page_alloc: add kernelcore_max_addr

Yasuaki Ishimatsu (4):
  x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node
  x86: use memblock_set_current_limit() to set memblock.current_limit
  memblock: limit memory address from memblock
  memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at
    memblock_find_in_range_node()

 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c             |  4 ++--
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c                  |  8 ++++++--
 include/linux/memblock.h            |  1 +
 mm/memblock.c                       | 10 +++++++---
 mm/page_alloc.c                     | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ