[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509106E2.70008@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:09:22 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <yinghai@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<jiang.liu@...wei.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI: container hot remove support.
Hi Tang,
2012/10/31 16:27, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The container hotplug handler container_notify_cb() didn't implement
> the hot-remove functionality. So, these 3 patches implement it like
> the following way:
>
> patch 1. Do not use kacpid_wq/kacpid_notify_wq to handle container hotplug event,
> use kacpi_hotplug_wq instead to avoid deadlock.
> Doing this is to reuse acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() in container
> hot-remove handling.
>
> patch 2. Introduce a new function container_device_remove() to handle
> ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event for container.
If container device contains memory device, the function is
very danger. As you know, we are developing a memory hotplug.
If memory has kernel memory, memory hot remove operations fails.
But container_device_remove() cannot realize it. So even if
the memory hot remove operation fails, container_device_remove()
keeps hot remove operation. Finally, the function sends _EJ0
to firmware. In this case, if the memory is accessed, kernel
panic occurs.
The example is as follows:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/26/318
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>
> change log v2 -> v3:
>
> 1. Add 1 patch(patch1). As Toshi Kan mentioned, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() is already
> kernel. So use it instead of alloc_acpi_hp_work() to add hotplug job onto kacpi_hotplug_wq.
>
> 2. In patch3: Print caller's function name when container_device_remove() fails to help to debug.
>
> 3. In patch3: Add commit message to describ why we need to call acpi_bus_trim() twice when
> removing devices.
>
> change log v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. In patch1: Based on the lastest for-pci-split-pci-root-hp-2 branch from Lu Yinghai,
> use alloc_acpi_hp_work() to add container hotplug work into kacpi_hotplug_wq.
>
> 2. In patch2: Allocate ej_event after container is stopped, so that we don't need to
> kfree the ej_event if stopping container failed.
>
>
> This is based on Lu Yinghai's job.
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git for-pci-split-pci-root-hp-2
>
>
> Tang Chen (3):
> Use acpi_os_hotplug_execute() instead of alloc_acpi_hp_work().
> Use kacpi_hotplug_wq to handle container hotplug event.
> Improve container_notify_cb() to support container hot-remove.
>
> drivers/acpi/container.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 28 +++++-----
> drivers/acpi/pci_root_hp.c | 25 ++++++---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 39 ++++++++-------
> include/acpi/acpiosxf.h | 7 +--
> 5 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists