linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] rcu: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121031115140.GX3027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 04:51:40 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
Cc:	dipankar@...ibm.com,
	Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] rcu:  use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper instead of
 per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:23:03PM +0800, Shan Wei wrote:
> From: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
> 
> smp_processor_id is defined as raw_smp_processor_id.
> replace per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id()) is also ok.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>

Hello, Shan Wei,

There are several definitions of this_cpu_ptr():

0 percpu.h 63 #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(ptr, my_cpu_offset)
1 percpu.h 65 #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) __this_cpu_ptr(ptr)
2 percpu.h 85 #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) per_cpu_ptr(ptr, 0)

The first uses my_cpu_offset, which is further defined in two ways:

0 percpu.h 33 #define my_cpu_offset per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id())
1 percpu.h 35 #define my_cpu_offset __my_cpu_offset

The first uses smp_processor_id(), which will complain if
force_quiescent_state() is called with preemption disabled, which it
sometimes is.

So what am I missing here?

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcutree.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 74df86b..3a21fcf 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
> 
>  	/* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
> -	rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
> +	rnp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)->mynode;
>  	for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
>  		ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
>  		      !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/