[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1210311653080.12781@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:55:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Alan Cox wrote:
> All this depends on your threat model. If I have physical access to
> suspend/resume your machine then you already lost. If I don't have
> physical access then I can't boot my unsigned OS to patch your S4 image
> so it doesn't matter.
Prepare (as a root) a hand-crafted image, reboot, let the kernel resume
from that artificial image.
It can be viewed as a very obscure way of rewriting the kernel through
/dev/mem (which is obviously not possible when in 'secure boot'
environment).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists