[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50914F10.2050903@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:17:20 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
klamm@...dex-team.ru, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm,vmscan: only evict file pages when we have plenty
On 10/31/2012 11:39 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:42:04PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> If we have more inactive file pages than active file pages, we
>> skip scanning the active file pages alltogether, with the idea
>> that we do not want to evict the working set when there is
>> plenty of streaming IO in the cache.
>>
>> However, the code forgot to also skip scanning anonymous pages
>> in that situation. That lead to the curious situation of keeping
>> the active file pages protected from being paged out when there
>> are lots of inactive file pages, while still scanning and evicting
>> anonymous pages.
>>
>> This patch fixes that situation, by only evicting file pages
>> when we have plenty of them and most are inactive.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 2624edc..1a53fbb 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -1686,6 +1686,15 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
>> fraction[1] = 0;
>> denominator = 1;
>> goto out;
>> + } else if (!inactive_file_is_low_global(zone)) {
>> + /*
>> + * There is enough inactive page cache, do not
>> + * reclaim anything from the working set right now.
>> + */
>> + fraction[0] = 0;
>> + fraction[1] = 1;
>> + denominator = 1;
>> + goto out;
>
> Is there a specific reason for making this exclusive to global
> reclaim? The "force scan anon when file is low" HAS to be specific to
> global reclaim because swapping may not be allowed in memcg limit
> reclaim, but not scanning anon when there is enough easy page cache is
> a legitimate memcg limit reclaim thing to do as well.
Good point. I guess this check would work fine inside
cgroup reclaim, too.
Want to give that a try?
>
> I.e. could this check be moved just below the
>
> /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
> if (!sc->may_swap || (nr_swap_pages <= 0)) {
> noswap = 1;
> fraction[0] = 0;
> fraction[1] = 1;
> denominator = 1;
> goto out;
> }
>
> section?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists