[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031170334.59833fb1@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:03:34 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:55:04 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > All this depends on your threat model. If I have physical access to
> > suspend/resume your machine then you already lost. If I don't have
> > physical access then I can't boot my unsigned OS to patch your S4 image
> > so it doesn't matter.
>
> Prepare (as a root) a hand-crafted image, reboot, let the kernel resume
> from that artificial image.
It's not signed. It won't reboot from that image.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists