[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031170431.GF2945@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:04:31 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, bsingharora@...il.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: use cgroup_lock_live_group(parent) in
cgroup_create()
Hey, Michal.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:55:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Only live parents can have children. Note that the liveliness
> > + * check isn't strictly necessary because cgroup_mkdir() and
> > + * cgroup_rmdir() are fully synchronized by i_mutex; however, do it
> > + * anyway so that locking is contained inside cgroup proper and we
> > + * don't get nasty surprises if we ever grow another caller.
> > + */
> > + if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(parent)) {
> > + err = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_free;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I think this should be moved up before we try to allocate any memory.
> Or is your motivation to keep cgroup_lock held for shorter time?
> I could agree with that but a small comment would be helpful.
Then I have to change the error out path more and I'm not sure I wanna
call deactivate_super() under cgroup_mutex. It's just simpler this
way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists