[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C9715CB7-D3E2-4CA7-8A93-2B10E8B70640@antoniou-consulting.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:04:05 +0200
From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...com>, Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
Hi Tony,
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com> [121031 10:26]:
>> It is painless to move the adapter DT devices to arch/arm/mach-omap2
>>
>> However I got bit by the __init at omap_build_device family functions.
>> If you don't remove it, crashes every time you instantiate a device
>> at runtime, or you load the cape driver as a module.
>
> Hmm I think you misunderstood me. You only need to create the
> platform_device under arch/arm/mach-omap2. The device creation
> happens only at __init, so omap_build_device can stay as __init.
> The driver itself should be under drivers.
>
> But is this bus on non-device-tree omaps? If not, just make it
> device tree only.
>
I'm afraid that's not the case. The whole notion of capebus is that
instantiation of the devices doesn't just happen early at the boot
sequence.
It is perfectly valid for a cape to be instantiated via loading
a module, or by making an override by writing a sysfs file.
When having the __init there, the function has been long removed
and you get a crash by calling into the weeds.
So the sequence is:
<early boot> Register the adapter driver.
<user> insmod bone-geiger-cape
<cape-is-matched> call omap_build_device
Please look into the capebus patches for the details.
> Regards,
>
> Tony
Regards
-- Pantelis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists