lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031184750.GA1740@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:47:50 +0100
From:	"Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] HID: hid-multitouch: support T and C for win8
 devices

> >> +                             usage_index) {
> >> +                             hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max,
> >> +                                     EV_ABS, ABS_MT_TOOL_X);
> >> +                             set_abs(hi->input, ABS_MT_TOOL_X, field,
> >> +                                     cls->sn_move);
> >> +                     } else {
> >> +                             hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max,
> >>                                       EV_ABS, ABS_MT_POSITION_X);
> >> -                     set_abs(hi->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, field,
> >> -                             cls->sn_move);
> >> +                             set_abs(hi->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, field,
> >> +                                     cls->sn_move);
> >> +                     }
> >> +
> >
> > Do we really want to do the latter several times, even if the device is not a win8 one?
> 
> I don't get your point here. The only difference with the previous
> release is that it will treat differently the first in the array than
> the others. For non win8 devices, there is no changes in the behavior.
> Could you elaborate a little bit more, please?

I was wondering what we want to do about multiple reports in the
general casel. Not that important though, the patch will probably look
fine in your next version.

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ