[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h390utqv3.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:53:52 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
At Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:28 +0000,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:28:16PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > request_firmware() is used for microcode loading, too, so it's fairly
> > a core part to cover, I'm afraid.
> >
> > I played a bit about this yesterday. The patch below is a proof of
> > concept to (ab)use the module signing mechanism for firmware loading
> > too. Sign firmware files via scripts/sign-file, and put to
> > /lib/firmware/signed directory.
>
> That does still leave me a little uneasy as far as the microcode
> licenses go. I don't know that we can distribute signed copies of some
> of them, and we obviously can't sign at the user end.
Yeah, that's a concern. Although this is a sort of "container" and
keeping the original data as is, it might be regarded as a
modification.
Another approach would be to a signature in a separate file, but I'm
not sure whether it makes sense.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists