linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/5] driver core / ACPI: Move ACPI support to core device and driver types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:03:34 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	x86 list <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] driver core / ACPI: Move ACPI support to core
 device and driver types

On 10/31/2012 11:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I wonder if the x86 and/or ia64 maintainers have any reservations?

Can you elaborate on the "tested by mika" that you put into the 0/5
message. Especially w.r.t. ia64. Compile tested? Boot tested? Ran with
some new device that uses the ACPI enumeration provided by this series?

Nothing in the concept or code scares me ... but I'd like to know that it
actually works :-)

-Tony