[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031200842.GC3027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:08:42 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] rcu: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper instead of
per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index 74df86b..3a21fcf 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
> >
> > /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
> > - rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
> > + rnp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)->mynode;
>
> Do
>
> rnp = this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
>
> instad.
One thing to keep in mind -- the only purpose of this is to diffuse
memory contention. So there is no need to disable preemption.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists