[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19D5B9DE@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:36:36 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	x86 list <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] driver core / ACPI: Move ACPI support to core
 device and driver types
> The BIOSes of currently available ia64 systems don't contain ACPI nodes whose
> IDs will match the IDs of the new devices (ie. the ones that are going to be
> added to acpi_platform_device_ids[]), so for ia64 it should be sufficient to
> test that code as is (ie. without any new devices in the system).
Ok - built cleanly on ia64.  Boots too. Just one new console message:
ACPI: bus type platform registered
that seems pretty harmless.
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
