[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351760981.8788.20.camel@sokoban>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:09:41 +0200
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MFD: twl-core: Fix chip ID for the twl6030-pwm module
Acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:54 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The correct chip id is 1 since the PWM module is on address 0x49. With the
> current TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 the kernel will crash early since:
> #define TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 0x0E
> and
> static struct twl_client twl_modules[4];
>
> Down in the stack we try to get the module by:
> struct twl_client *twl = &twl_modules[chip];
>
> Which obviously going to do nasty things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Can you push this patch to 3.7?
> Without this if the user enables the twl6030-pwm driver the kernel will not
> going to boot on OMAP4.
>
> Thank you,
> Peter
>
> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> index 2624668..d7577cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base,
> }
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_TWL6030) && twl_class_is_6030()) {
> - child = add_child(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0,
> + child = add_child(SUB_CHIP_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0,
> false, 0, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(child))
> return PTR_ERR(child);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists