| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:37:51 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:28:43 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:31:27PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Linux vendors may care about Linux on Linux attacks. It's all fun and > > > games until Oracle get Microsoft to revoke Red Hat's signature. > > > > Fear uncertainty and doubt (and if you think Oracle are going to do that > > I suspect your lawyers should deal with it) > > Lawyers won't remove blacklist entries. Fear Uncertainty and Doubt Courts do, injunctions do, the possibilty of getting caught with theirs hands in the till does. But I suspect your lawyers should also deal with public comments about Oracle such as the one you've made before you make them in public 8) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists