[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121101213751.377ebaa8@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:37:51 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:28:43 +0000
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:31:27PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Linux vendors may care about Linux on Linux attacks. It's all fun and
> > > games until Oracle get Microsoft to revoke Red Hat's signature.
> >
> > Fear uncertainty and doubt (and if you think Oracle are going to do that
> > I suspect your lawyers should deal with it)
>
> Lawyers won't remove blacklist entries.
Fear Uncertainty and Doubt
Courts do, injunctions do, the possibilty of getting caught with theirs
hands in the till does.
But I suspect your lawyers should also deal with public comments about
Oracle such as the one you've made before you make them in public 8)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists