[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5092039C.60009@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:07:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, maxk@...lcomm.com,
haixiao@...iper.net, ernesto.martin@...sat.com,
krkumar2@...ibm.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 0/7] Multiqueue support in tuntap
On 10/31/2012 07:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I am testing BQL for tuntap.
> It wouldn't be hard to do BQL in the multi-queue version.
Yes, if BQL for tuntap is in first, I will rebase and convert it to
multiqueue version.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists