lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5092119F.1000600@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:07:27 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	bhelgaas@...gle.com, lenb@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Use acpi_os_hotplug_execute() instead of alloc_acpi_hp_work().

On 11/01/2012 11:52 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>  wrote:
> Please check if you can just fold
>     acpi_hp_cb_execute
> callers, and use acpi_os_hotplug_execute directly.
>
> and have two local conext struct too.
>
I think this could bring some duplicated work. We need to do the same
work every time we call acpi_os_hotplug_execute(), what has been done
in acpi_hp_cb_execute().

I can try to modify it and resend a new patch to see if it is better.

Thanks. :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ