[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN8Q1EcHJyDMs-z8Vw_=cpnCL2FO_pATaGThh2UHv4ketC-_Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:36:25 -0700
From: Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] net: netfilter: Serialize xt_write_recseq sections
on RT
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> that and needs explicit serialization here.
>
> Reported-by: Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> diff --git a/include/linux/locallock.h b/include/linux/locallock.h
> index f1804a3..a5eea5d 100644
> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> index 32cddf7..bed90da2 100644
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 899b71c..5db16ea 100644
I'm have a setup running 3.0.48-rt72. It's been running about 8 hours
so far, and tomorrow I'll know if there's been any problems. I'm
confident things will be fine tomorrow, and at that time I'll be glad
to attach a Tested-by tag.
Thanks,
Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists