[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121102121556.GV21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:15:56 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: plat-versatile: move FPGA irq driver to
drivers/irqchip
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:20:10PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Linus,
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:28:49 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > +void fpga_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> This function does not need to be exposed in a public header: as
> proposed for the bcm2835 and armada-370-xp IRQ controller drivers, the
> driver should directly do handle_arch_irq = fpga_handle_irq, and
> therefore there is no need for the machine desc structure to reference
> fpga_handle_irq anymore.
Err no, then you don't understand what's going on here. This may or may
not be a top-level IRQ handler. Some ARM platforms have three of these
cascaded, others have one of these cascaded off a VIC or GIC.
To override the top level IRQ handler unconditionally is going to break
platforms.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists