linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/25] perf tests: Move test objects into 'tests' directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:48:57 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] perf tests: Move test objects into 'tests' directory

Hi Jiri,

Despite its way to acme's tree, I'd like to leave a few comments. :)


On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:01:43 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Separating test objects into 'tests' directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Makefile                 |    9 +-
>  tools/perf/builtin-test.c           | 1559 -----------------------------------
>  tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c     | 1559 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c         |  153 ++++
>  tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c     | 1116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/dso-test-data.c     |  153 ----
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events-test.c | 1116 -------------------------

Looks like it should be considered as renames.  Isn't 'git format-patch
-M' working?


>  7 files changed, 2833 insertions(+), 2832 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-test.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
>  delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/dso-test-data.c
>  delete mode 100644 tools/perf/util/parse-events-test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> index 3e807d7..2d3427f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ endif
>  
>  ### --- END CONFIGURATION SECTION ---
>  
> -BASIC_CFLAGS = -Iutil/include -Iarch/$(ARCH)/include -I$(OUTPUT)util -I$(TRACE_EVENT_DIR) -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
> +BASIC_CFLAGS = -Iutil/include -Iarch/$(ARCH)/include -I$(OUTPUT)util -Iutil -I. -I$(TRACE_EVENT_DIR) -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE

Hmm..  Do you really want this?  AFAIK there're lots of places that
include header files under the util directory and they used relative
path.  I don't know how it affects them but at least they can be changed
to use simpler path with this change.


>  BASIC_LDFLAGS =
>  
>  ifeq ($(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_BIONIC),$(CFLAGS),bionic),y)
> @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/help.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/levenshtein.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/parse-options.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/parse-events.o
> -LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/parse-events-test.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/path.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/rbtree.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/bitmap.o
> @@ -389,7 +388,6 @@ LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/sigchain.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/dso.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/symbol.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/symbol-elf.o
> -LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/dso-test-data.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/color.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/pager.o
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)util/header.o
> @@ -430,6 +428,9 @@ LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)ui/stdio/hist.o
>  
>  LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/common.o
>  
> +LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)tests/parse-events.o
> +LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)tests/dso-data.o
> +

Maybe TEST_OBJS?  I guess they don't need to be included in libperf?


>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-annotate.o
>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-bench.o
>  # Benchmark modules
> @@ -459,8 +460,8 @@ BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-probe.o
>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-kmem.o
>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-lock.o
>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-kvm.o
> -BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-test.o
>  BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-inject.o
> +BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)tests/builtin-test.o

Placing builtin command in a different directory looks little bit odd.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/