linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:18:42 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty_port

On 11/02/2012 05:07 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>> On 10/31/2012 04:59 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> So you probably want a lot more than 100k syscalls, why limit it at
>>> all actually?
>>
>> I unset the limit but I still can't reproduce...
>>
>>> I've attached my .config for the guest kernel as reference.
>>
>> Even using this config does not help to reproduce that.
>>
>> Do you use some special trinity params?
> 
> Not really:
> 
>     ./trinity -m --quiet --dangerous -l off

Oh, you run that as root??

> Can I add something to my kernel to provide more info when it happens?

Maybe the attached patch can tell us more...

-- 
js
suse labs

View attachment "0001-tty-BUF-DEBUG.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1026 bytes)