[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121102181026.GY3027@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:10:26 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of
per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:01:47AM +0800, Shan Wei wrote:
> From: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 74df86b..441b945 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
>
> /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
> - rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
> + rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
OK, I'll bite... Why this instead of:
rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda)->mynode;
Thanx, Paul
> for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
> ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists