linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] kmem controller for memcg.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAmzW4O74e3J9M3Q86Y0wXX6Pfp8GDpv6jAB5ebJPHfAxAeL0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 3 Nov 2012 04:25:59 +0900
From:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] kmem controller for memcg.

Hello, Glauber.

2012/11/2 Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>:
> On 11/02/2012 04:04 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu,  1 Nov 2012 16:07:16 +0400
>> Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This work introduces the kernel memory controller for memcg. Unlike previous
>>> submissions, this includes the whole controller, comprised of slab and stack
>>> memory.
>>
>> I'm in the middle of (re)reading all this.  Meanwhile I'll push it all
>> out to http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/ for the crazier testers.
>>
>> One thing:
>>
>>> Numbers can be found at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/239
>>
>> You claim in the above that the fork worload is 'slab intensive".  Or
>> at least, you seem to - it's a bit fuzzy.
>>
>> But how slab intensive is it, really?
>>
>> What is extremely slab intensive is networking.  The networking guys
>> are very sensitive to slab performance.  If this hasn't already been
>> done, could you please determine what impact this has upon networking?
>> I expect Eric Dumazet, Dave Miller and Tom Herbert could suggest
>> testing approaches.
>>
>
> I can test it, but unfortunately I am unlikely to get to prepare a good
> environment before Barcelona.
>
> I know, however, that Greg Thelen was testing netperf in his setup.
> Greg, do you have any publishable numbers you could share?

Below is my humble opinion.
I am worrying about data cache footprint which is possibly caused by
this patchset, especially slab implementation.
If there are several memcg cgroups, each cgroup has it's own kmem_caches.
When each group do slab-intensive job hard, data cache may be overflowed easily,
and cache miss rate will be high, therefore this would decrease system
performance highly.
Is there any result about this?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/