[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121102201824.41b2516d@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:18:24 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: setting up CDB filters in udev (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block:
add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs)
> * Devices are given standard filter matching the device class. Any
> !CAP_SYS_RAWIO user can only issue commands allowed by the filter.
>
> * CAP_SYS_RAWIO can issue an ioctl to disable the filter all
> accessors of the fd and transfer it.
>
> That should be enough, no?
No
a - there are lots of cases you want to allow only a subset of commands.
b - if you are using a BPF filter which is the obvious way to do it then
the flexibility comes for free without any extra complexity as the kernel
provides a generic implementation, and even a JIT for complex cases.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists