| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:31:39 +0100 From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote: >> >> Here are some stats: >> >> - Applying the patch from -next on top of your current git head >> results in 3 conflicts. >> >> - Applying the patch from your current git head on top of v3.6 results >> in 18 conflicts. >> >> - Applying the patch from 3.6 on top of 3.5 results in 25 conflicts. > > Ok, that sounds slightly painful, but not unmanageable. > > Can you send me the actual patch, and I'll mull on this a bit more? I > could run the coccinelle script myself, but I assume (maybe > incorrectly?) that there are manual fixes to clean some stuff up > afterwared.. We're working on improvements for Sasha's Coccinelle script, but need some time to finish it. > > Linus -- Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists