linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Suspend/resume without VT switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7608326.fQBj17U8Wv@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:51:07 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Suspend/resume without VT switches

On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my
> suspend/resume sequence a bit prettier.  It should speed things up
> trivally as well, but most of those gains come from other changes to the
> i915 driver (posted earlier to intel-gfx).
> 
> Any thoughts?

I like the idea.

> I suspect we'll have to be more defensive about the
> resume configuration in case the BIOS did something weird, but overall I
> think we should be able to do this one way or another.

Perhaps patch [1/2] should be [2/2] and vice versa? :-)

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/