[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211021626150.11106@eggly.anvils>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
bsingharora@...il.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix hotplugged memory zone oops
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> OK, it adds "an overhead" also when there is no hotadd going on but this
> is just one additional mem access&cmp&je so it shouldn't be noticable
> (lruvec->zone is used most of the time later so it not a pointless
> load).
I think so too.
> It is also easier to backport for stable.
Yes.
> But is there any reason to fix it later properly in the hotadd hook?
I don't know. Not everybody liked it fixed this way: it's not
unreasonable to see this as a quick hack rather than the right fix.
I was expecting objectors to post alternative hotadd hook patches,
then we could compare and decide. That didn't happen; but we can
certainly look to taking out these lines later if something we
agree is better comes along. Not high on anyone's agenda, I think.
>
> Anyway
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Thanks,
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists