[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351940317-14812-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:58:21 +0100
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/16] use WARN
These patches use WARN, which combines printk and WARN_ON(1), or WARN_ONCE,
which combines printk and WARN_ON_ONCE(1). This does not appear to affect
the behavior, but makes the code a little more concise.
The semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). In particular, it only transforms the case
where the WARN_ON or WARN_ON_ONCE is preceded by a single printk.
// <smpl>
@bad1@
position p;
@@
printk(...);
printk@p(...);
WARN_ON(1);
@ok1@
expression list es;
position p != bad1.p;
@@
-printk@p(
+WARN(1,
es);
-WARN_ON(1);
@@
expression list ok1.es;
@@
if (...)
- {
WARN(1,es);
- }
@bad2@
position p;
@@
printk(...);
printk@p(...);
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@ok2@
expression list es;
position p != bad2.p;
@@
-printk@p(
+WARN_ONCE(1,
es);
-WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@
expression list ok2.es;
@@
if (...)
- {
WARN_ONCE(1,es);
- }
// </smpl>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists