lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:04:04 +0800 From: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com> To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches > > In reality, this report is larger but I chopped it down a bit for > brevity. autonuma beats schednuma *heavily* on this benchmark both in > terms of average operations per numa node and overall throughput. > > SPECJBB PEAKS > 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0 > rc2-stats-v2r1 rc2-autonuma-v27r8 rc2-schednuma-v1r3 > Expctd Warehouse 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) > Expctd Peak Bops 442225.00 ( 0.00%) 596039.00 ( 34.78%) 555342.00 ( 25.58%) > Actual Warehouse 7.00 ( 0.00%) 9.00 ( 28.57%) 8.00 ( 14.29%) > Actual Peak Bops 550747.00 ( 0.00%) 646124.00 ( 17.32%) 560635.00 ( 1.80%) It is impressive report! Could you like to share the what JVM and options are you using in the testing, and based on which kinds of platform? -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists