[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGjg+kHrbjr8T0+TOEKp6Mx4zZBbrh_3VPUt81nWj6u3xi=NNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:04:04 +0800
From: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches
>
> In reality, this report is larger but I chopped it down a bit for
> brevity. autonuma beats schednuma *heavily* on this benchmark both in
> terms of average operations per numa node and overall throughput.
>
> SPECJBB PEAKS
> 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0
> rc2-stats-v2r1 rc2-autonuma-v27r8 rc2-schednuma-v1r3
> Expctd Warehouse 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 0.00%)
> Expctd Peak Bops 442225.00 ( 0.00%) 596039.00 ( 34.78%) 555342.00 ( 25.58%)
> Actual Warehouse 7.00 ( 0.00%) 9.00 ( 28.57%) 8.00 ( 14.29%)
> Actual Peak Bops 550747.00 ( 0.00%) 646124.00 ( 17.32%) 560635.00 ( 1.80%)
It is impressive report!
Could you like to share the what JVM and options are you using in the
testing, and based on which kinds of platform?
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists