[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351943332.16850.25.camel@maggy.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0700
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Michal Zatloukal <myxal.mxl@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Nice processes prevent frequency increases - possible
scheduler regression (known good in 2.6.35)
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 04:33 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
>
> > On the new kernel, the nice processes are never starved - even when
> > starting a tab-laden chromium session, the processes for BOINC keep
> > about 20% CPU each (that is normalized to all CPUs, ie 40% nice load
> > on each core). The problem is, the governor now seems to consider the
> > non-nice task unable to saturate the CPU, and the cores' frequencies
> > are hovering between 1.0 and 1.8 GHz. The scheduler keeps scheduling
> > the nice tasks, and the non-nice tasks are progressing much slower,
> > caused by the lower CPU speed as well as less processing time
> > allocated to them. HD video stutters often, and Chromium takes at
> > least 2-3 times longer to fully load.
>
> Your nice 19 tasks receiving 'too much' CPU when there are other
> runnable tasks around sounds like you have SCHED_AUTOGROUP enabled.
(forgot to mention: if that's the case, you can add noautogroup to your
kernel command line to turn it off if distro turned it on in .config)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists