| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87sj8rwm0p.fsf@xmission.com> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:47:02 -0700 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> writes: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:03:02PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> I don't want my system p0wned in the first place and I don't want to run >> windows. Why should I trust Microsoft's signing key? > > There's no reason to. Systems that don't trust Microsoft's signing key > have no reason to be concerned about Microsoft revocation. > Unfortunately, that's not the only set of people we have to worry > about. No reason to? How can I configure an off the shelf system originally sold with windows 8 installed to boot in UEFI secure boot mode using shim without trusting Microsoft's key? Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists