[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121103115129.GA4508@cachalot>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:51:29 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc: add "Seccomp" to status
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:35 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> @@ -327,6 +327,13 @@ static inline void task_cap(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
> render_cap_t(m, "CapBnd:\t", &cap_bset);
> }
>
> +static inline void task_seccomp(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
> + seq_printf(m, "Seccomp:\t%d\n", p->seccomp.mode);
> +#endif
Hmm, probably it's better to always show this line, not only on
SECCOMP'ed kernel? If it is disabled just print "0". It will simplify
parsing of /proc/pid/status.
> +}
> +
> static inline void task_context_switch_counts(struct seq_file *m,
> struct task_struct *p)
> {
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists