[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509509F8.2010407@bfs.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:11:36 +0100
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] drivers/misc/kgdbts.c: use WARN
Am 03.11.2012 11:58, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
> is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression list es;
> @@
>
> -printk(
> +WARN(1,
> es);
> -WARN_ON(1);
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> drivers/misc/kgdbts.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> index 3aa9a96..8b367db 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> @@ -114,9 +114,8 @@
> touch_nmi_watchdog(); \
> } while (0)
> #define eprintk(a...) do { \
> - printk(KERN_ERR a); \
> - WARN_ON(1); \
> - } while (0)
> + WARN(1, KERN_ERR a); \
> + } while (0)
> #define MAX_CONFIG_LEN 40
>
A macro calling a macro ?
Is it possible to replace eprintk() ?
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists