[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351955605.4004.159.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:13:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ 0/4] 3.0.51-stable review
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 07:43 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > > > > Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > > > > x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt() facility
> > > >
> > > > I glanced at the the downloadable consolidated patch and its hunks seem to be present,
> > > > though.
> > >
> > > I do not understand. Where do you not see it? It's in the patch on
> > > kernel.org, right? Where is it missing?
> > >
> >
> > The LKML patch series is missing PATCH 02/04.
>
> Odd, I received a copy, but I don't know if it came from lkml or as a
> copy sent to me directly. I'll bounce it to you if you are curious
> about it.
>
Yeah, 2/4 is missing. Probably had too many Cc's. I really wish David
Miller would remove that limit. I bet it's kept more legitimate emails
from making LKML than it has spam.
I know I've been burnt by it a few times :-/
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists