linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50947B7B.8080601@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:03:39 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty_port

On 11/02/2012 12:18 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 05:07 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2012 04:59 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> So you probably want a lot more than 100k syscalls, why limit it at
>>>> all actually?
>>>
>>> I unset the limit but I still can't reproduce...
>>>
>>>> I've attached my .config for the guest kernel as reference.
>>>
>>> Even using this config does not help to reproduce that.
>>>
>>> Do you use some special trinity params?
>>
>> Not really:
>>
>>     ./trinity -m --quiet --dangerous -l off
> 
> Oh, you run that as root??
> 
>> Can I add something to my kernel to provide more info when it happens?
> 
> Maybe the attached patch can tell us more...
> 

Nope, I see the warnings mentioned before, without the new 'HUH' warnings.


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/