linux-kernel - Re: [ 0/4] 3.0.51-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121103040711.GD1602@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:07:11 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ 0/4] 3.0.51-stable review

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:31:10PM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:06:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
> > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Nov  4 17:03:28 UTC 2012.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.51-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > -------------
> > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> > 
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >     Linux 3.0.51-rc1
> > 
> > Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
> >     drm/nouveau: silence modesetting spam on pre-gf8 chipsets
> > 
> > Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >     mm: fix XFS oops due to dirty pages without buffers on s390
> > 
> 
> Howdy Greg,
> 
> Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> >     x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt() facility
> 
> I glanced at the the downloadable consolidated patch and its hunks seem to be present,
> though.

I do not understand.  Where do you not see it?  It's in the patch on
kernel.org, right?  Where is it missing?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/