[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121103082047.GA20868@secunet.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:47 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
timo.teras@....fi, NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] net: core: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:44:55PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
> > +++ b/net/core/flow.c
> > @@ -327,11 +327,9 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> > static void flow_cache_flush_per_cpu(void *data)
> > {
> > struct flow_flush_info *info = data;
> > - int cpu;
> > struct tasklet_struct *tasklet;
> >
> > - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > - tasklet = &per_cpu_ptr(info->cache->percpu, cpu)->flush_tasklet;
> > + tasklet = &this_cpu_ptr(info->cache->percpu)->flush_tasklet
>
> Another case for the use of this_cpu_read
Actually, smp_processor_id() is used if either preemtion is off or
in a thread that is bound to the current cpu. So all code that uses
smp_processor_id() should be able to use __this_cpu_read instead of
this_cpu_read.
In this case, flow_cache_flush_per_cpu() is called via smp_call_function(),
so it is bound on the current cpu.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists