[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1211041656580.1960@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:57:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] drop if around WARN_ON
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
>> These patches convert a conditional with a simple test expression and a
>> then branch that only calls WARN_ON(1) to just a call to WARN_ON, which
>> will test the condition.
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @@
>> expression e;
>> @@
>>
>> (
>> if(<+...e(...)...+>) WARN_ON(1);
>> |
>> - if (e) WARN_ON(1);
>> + WARN_ON(e);
>> )// </smpl>
>
> So this deals with WARN_ON(), are you considering doing the same for
> the rest of it's friends?
I tried WARN_ON_ONCE, but the pattern never occurred. Are there others
that are worth trying?
thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists