[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871ug9yls5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:16:02 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
krkumar2@...ibm.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc net-next v6 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> writes:
> This patch implement the {set|get}_channels method of ethool to allow user to
> change the number of queues dymaically when the device is running. This would
> let the user to tune the device for specific applications.
...
> + /* Only two modes were support currently */
> + if (queue_pairs == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (queue_pairs != vi->total_queue_pairs - 1 && queue_pairs != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
OK, so you let them do all or nothing, but this three-way test is
pretty unclear.
In fact, the whole total_queue_pairs/num_queue_pairs thing is weird (and
uncommented). I think for "total" you mean "max"; the maximum possible
queue pair number.
Let me go back and review the previous patch again...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists