lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <op.wm8r8fjw6426ze@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:20:29 +0100
From:	Uwaysi Bin Kareem <uwaysi.bin.kareem@...adoxuncreated.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de
Subject: Re: Scheduler queues for less os-jitter?

Ok, anyway realtime processes did not work quite as expected.  
("overloaded" machine, even though cpu-time is only 10%). So I guess I  
have to enable cgroups and live with the overhead then.

If I set cpu-limits there, does that involve an absolute value, or is it  
normalized, so that even if I do 0.001% cpu for processes, they get all  
cpu, when there is nothing running?

Peace Be With You.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ