linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/13] HW-latency: hardware latency test 0.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <op.wnak7vehcqzgxa@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:44:09 +0100
From:	No recipient <no.recipient@...adoxuncreated.com>
To:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] HW-latency: hardware latency test 0.10

On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:59:32 +0100, Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com> wrote:

> This patch is the first step to test some basic hardware functions like
> TSC to help people understand if there is any hardware latency as well
> as throughput problem exposed on bare metal or left behind by BIOS or
> interfered by SMI. Currently the patch tests TSC, CPU Frequency and
> RDRAND which is a new CPU instruction to get random number introduced in
> new CPU like Intel Ivy Bridge in stop_machine context,which is choosen to
> make sure testers fully control their system under test to rule out some
> level of unwanted noise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...el.com>

That patch has my full stamp of approval!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/